Gary Anderson's article on Formula 1's customer engine idea is a thought-provoking read, offering a critical perspective on a potentially disruptive change in the sport. Anderson's main argument revolves around the potential pitfalls of introducing a customer engine alongside the existing manufacturer power unit formula.
He begins by highlighting the importance of careful consideration before making any rash decisions, drawing a parallel to a past tender process for spec engines and gearboxes that ultimately failed. Anderson emphasizes the volatile nature of F1 engine suppliers, noting how manufacturers like Toyota, BMW, Peugeot, and Honda have come and gone over the years due to boardroom decisions. He argues that the current power unit issues are largely the fault of the governing body, the FIA, and their regulations.
One of the key concerns Anderson raises is the potential for a customer engine to create a divide between teams, with manufacturers potentially offering inferior products to their own teams. This could undermine the attempts to level the playing field through measures like the cost cap and fairer Concorde Agreement payments. Anderson suggests that the introduction of a customer engine might lead to a 'haves and have-nots' scenario, which goes against the spirit of the sport.
He also criticizes the idea of a V8 formula, suggesting that a 2.4-litre normally aspirated V6 would be a better option to achieve the desired horsepower and noise levels. Anderson proposes a solution where the FIA and Liberty Media collaborate with power unit manufacturers and independent engine manufacturers to create a more flexible power unit concept. This would allow for increased deviation and challenge, ensuring that no single manufacturer dominates.
Anderson's commentary is insightful, as he navigates the complex landscape of F1 engine regulations and their impact on the sport. He offers a critical perspective on the potential consequences of introducing a customer engine, urging the governing body to carefully consider the implications before making any decisions that could significantly alter the competitive balance of Formula 1.
